Best Telegram Trading Bots for Memecoins in 2026

A few days ago I was trying to figure out what the actual best Telegram trading bot for memecoins is. I asked around in a few groups, but most of the replies were just people shilling their own referral links as opposed to giving real answers.

So, in the spirit of doing a little community service, I figured I'd be the change I wanted to see in the world. I loaded up some wallets and spent the last few days actually testing the top Telegram trading bots myself to see which ones are the fastest and most intuitive, whilst simultaneously being as safe as possible.

Here are the bots I tested:

• Dawn
• Trojan
• Bloom
• Maestro
• Banana Gun

The following are my results.

How we tested

Each bot was scored separately on usability, security and speed. Usability comes from trading with each bot from funded wallets, and security from how each one handles your private keys and whether it has been exploited before. For speed, all five bots' auto-buy and auto-sell functions were triggered at the same moment, and every transaction was looked up on a blockchain explorer to see which block it landed in. The placements for every round are in the speed test below.

How Memecoin University researches and verifies tools →

Quick comparison

Before diving into the detailed reviews, here is a quick TLDR at how these bots stack up against each other:

Bot	Supported Chains	Average Fee	Copy Trading	Sniper & Limits	Wallet Setup	Overall Speed
Dawn	Multi-chain (Solana, Base, BNB Chain, Robinhood Chain, Ink, Arc, HyperEVM)	~1%	Yes	Yes	Privy Infrastructure	1st
Banana Gun	Multi-chain (Solana, Ethereum, Base, Blast)B	0.5%–1%	Yes	Yes	Bot-Managed	2nd
Trojan	Solana only	1%	Yes	Yes	Bot-Managed	3rd
Bloom	Multi-chain	~1%	Yes	Yes	Bot-Managed	4th
Maestro	Multi-chainExtensive	1%	Yes	Yes	Bot-Managed	5th

Core features

Fees

Almost all top bots charge a baseline 1% fee on trades. Trojan charges 1% but gives every user 20% cashback on fees. Banana Gun charges 1% for auto-snipes but drops manual ETH trades to 0.5%. Dawn charges roughly 1% but covers up to $5 of network gas on every trade, which is a massive cost-saver for active traders.

Copy Trading

Every bot tested supports copy trading functionality. Trojan offers incredibly robust copy-trading settings, including daily loss caps and specific allocation rules. Dawn, Bloom, Maestro, and Banana Gun also feature standard wallet-copying functionalities natively within their menus.

Wallet Management & Multichain Support

This is where the bots diverge the most. Trojan is strictly built for the Solana network. Maestro, Bloom, and Banana Gun support multiple chains, but require you to manage separate wallets and native gas tokens for every single network. Dawn uses a unified balance system where a single USDC deposit works across Solana, Base, BNB Chain, Robinhood Chain, Ink, Arc and HyperEVM.

Usability

First, let's consider how easy each bot is to use.

1. Dawn

Right out of the gate, Dawn was by far the easiest to wrap my head around. The standout feature here is their unified balance system so you don't have to keep separate balances and gas tokens for Solana, Base, BNB, etc. If you trade, you already know the nightmare of managing different wallets and funds so that fact that you can deposit USDC and trade anywhere easily is a premium feature when it comes to ease of use.

The UI feels super clean, the homepage gives you exactly what you need, and navigating the platform feels buttery smooth.

Usability rating

9.5/10

2. Trojan

Trojan is an absolute heavy hitter for Solana, and there is a reason it has so much volume. But honestly, if you are looking for pure simplicity, it feels kind of crowded. Because they try to pack every single feature under the sun into a Telegram chat interface (most useless and others less so) you end up having to click through a maze of sub-menus just to customise your settings the way you want. It can be super overwhelming if you just want to do a quick swap on a fast-moving coin. Don't get me wrong, it's solid if you're purely trading on SOL and want a full-blown trading terminal inside Telegram, but it completely lacks the frictionless, absolute simplicity I was looking for.

Usability rating

8/10

3. Bloom

Bloom was okay, but again, similar to Trojan, I had to dock points because it feels like it's trying to do just a bit too much at once. Instead of just being a fast, simple Telegram bot, they push a complicated "all-in-one" ecosystem. The interface is constantly pushing you toward their browser extensions, Discord scrapers, and automation tasks; along with a slew of some more impractical features. When you're trying to snipe a memecoin fast from your phone, you don't want to be dealing with too much. It feels incredibly over-engineered for what should be a simple paste-and-buy process. It might be cool if you want to run autonomous scripts while you sleep, but it feels way too convoluted for manual speed trading.

Usability rating

7/10

4. Maestro

Maestro has been around since the early days of Telegram trading, and honestly, it really shows. The interface feels incredibly dated and clunky compared to the modern, streamlined bots.

There is no unified balance system here like Dawn. If you want to trade across different networks, you have to manually click through a maze of old-school inline keyboard buttons to switch chains, manage separate wallets, and fund gas tokens for each one individually. Clicking through all of that takes noticeably more time and mental energy than using Dawn or Trojan. On top of the UI being a headache, Maestro suffered a massive router exploit in the past that drained a massive amount of user funds. With that kind of security history and a laggy interface, I can't, in good faith, recommend it.

Usability rating

4/10

5. Banana Gun

Similar to Maestro, Banana Gun feels like you're operating a clunky machine. It is incredibly heavy on technical parameters, making it anything but beginner-friendly. Before you can even make a simple trade, the bot bombards you with settings for MEV protection, anti-rug parameters, block reorganization protection, and manual gas tips. It does the job if you are a highly technical sniper trying to configure the exact milliseconds of a token launch, but for standard trading, it feels slightly cluttered.

The navigation speed is laggy at times due to how much data it tries to process all at once, and the whole experience feels like you're fighting the bot rather than it helping you.

Usability rating

5/10

Security

The next thing I want to cover is security, because this is a massive deal with memecoins. There is a long history of Telegram bots getting exploited, and if you choose the wrong one then your wallet gets drained and there's nothing you can do.

While researching this, the main thing I looked at was how they handle your private keys.

1. Maestro & Banana Gun

I'm grouping these two together because they both share a notable history: Maestro and Banana Gun have both suffered from security issues in the past. Maestro experienced a router exploit where around $500,000 was drained from users while Banana Gun got drained for $3 million.

However, to be fair to both teams, they fully refunded the affected users out of their project treasuries and have since heavily upgraded their security. Both bots patched their respective vulnerabilities, underwent new audits, and currently operate on standard server-side, encrypted hot wallets (similar to Trojan and Bloom). While their current setups are perfectly functional and widely used today, having a history of major breaches is definitely still concerning for anyone keeping large funds idle in a bot. They are much safer now, but I still remain slightly cautious.

Sources: The Defiant: Banana Gun pledges to pay back victims of $3 million exploit · CertiK: Maestro and Unibot

2. Bloom & Trojan

Both of these bots haven't had massive headline-making exploits like the previous two, which is good. However, their wallet infrastructure is still fairly standard and relies heavily on their own servers. They are safe enough for active trading, but I'd still be careful leaving large amounts of money on them.

Source: uwuu.ai: Trojan bot review

3. Dawn

Dawn takes a different approach by integrating Privy for their wallet infrastructure. This means that your private keys are managed through a dedicated third-party provider, rather than being stored directly on the bot's own servers. They also include two-factor authentication (2FA) to add an extra layer of protection to your account.

Source: Dawn docs: Security

Speed test

To keep the test accurate, I established a strict methodology. In September 2026, I ran six individual tests (3 buys, 3 sells) using the exact same token address and identical trade sizes. I set equal priority fees across all five bots and triggered their auto-buy/sell functions simultaneously. I then checked the blockchain explorer to verify exactly which block each transaction actually landed in.

Bot	Test 1 Buy	Test 1 Sell	Test 2 Buy	Test 2 Sell	Test 3 Buy	Test 3 Sell	Ranking
Dawn	2	1	2	2	1	1	First
Banana Gun	1	3	4	1	2	3	Second
Trojan	3	2	3	3	3	2	Third
Bloom	4	4	1	4	4	4	Fourth
Maestro	5	5	5	5	5	5	Last

Starting at the bottom, Maestro was completely outclassed, locking in dead last across every single test without exception.

Bloom didn't fare much better, floating near the bottom in 4th place for most rounds, though it did manage a surprising 1st-place spike on the second buy test.

Trojan held a respectable middle-of-the-pack performance, sitting consistently around 3rd place with a couple of solid 2nd-place finishes on sell executions.

Banana Gun showed off its raw speed, snatching 1st place on both the first buy and second sell tests. However, its speed was a bit erratic, dipping down to 3rd and 4th place on other rounds.

Dawn took the crown through pure consistency. It never placed lower than 2nd across the entire benchmark and locked down 1st place on half of the individual tests.

Speed scores

• Dawn9/10
• Banana Gun9/10
• Trojan7/10
• Bloom5.5/10
• Maestro3/10

Final scores

Bottom line

FAQ